Minister Wasserlauf claims that the ombudsman discriminates favorably against the protesters of the legal revolution. At today's hearing, an argument broke out between the attorney and the minister's representative after it compared the protest to the protesters against secession.
The two received a stinging comment from a fellow judge, which led to a burst of laughter in the courtroom. Yesterday, miraculously and without any explanation, the composition of the judges changed, and Judge Yehiel Kosher was replaced by Judge Kabov. The parties in the case were not informed of this, and the Judiciary has not yet responded to Walla's inquiry on the subject. The panel of judges hearing the case is Judge Yitzhak Amit, Judge Khaled Kabob, and Judge David Mintz. The hearing on the petition of the Minister of Galilee Negev against the attorney Gali Beharev Miara was held today at the High Court. The petition deals with the fringes of protest that have descended from a world of protest to a world of breaking the law. Attorney Miron: "The womanizer invited him to discuss it, and he asked to sit down with her on the basis of data. " Judge Mintz insisted: "Sir, you are not answering me, with all due respect, this is not an answer. The minister has his tools, is the minister saying that the policy is up to God, is this what we are discussing?" Miron replied: "Even if my answer does not capture your honor's opinion, I will come back and answer." The attorney general's representative Mittal Buchman Schindel presented the position: "Selective enforcement is prohibited, but you have to show a number of indictments filed on the subject. " The petition does not present any concrete case that justifies the filing of an indictment; there is really no real claim for selective enforcement, but an inclusive claim. The court does not provide remedies for selective enforcement. The attempt to interfere with the judgment of the prosecution is out of place. There is no place to allow a party within the government to interfere.