Web search engines only allow content related to a person to be deleted in certain situations provided for by law. The precedent set by the Supreme Court on the right to be forgotten and when to go to court.
The most notable cases of recent times in Argentina were those of Natalia De Negri and Mara Belén Rodrguez. The first motivated by the intention that a case of mistaken identity could be solved. The second was motivated by a desire to get justice for the victim of a crime that was never solved. It was the first case of a mistaken identity that could be resolved by a court of law, and the first was the most notable case of an individual who wanted to get his name removed from the web. The case was Clarn de Negri, the host of the television show “The Host’s Wife” on Channel 4. The show is based on the book “The Hosts’ by Natalia De Negri, which is published by Biteback. The right to be forgotten has no basis in the Argentine Constitution, nor in the treaties ratified by our nation. This has been ratified by Supreme Court rulings that protect freedom of expression on legal and public content on the Internet. However, the ruling in the case of Mara Belén Rodriguez left open the possibility of conducting a more in-depth analysis and giving the issue parliamentary treatment. The ruling was the first in the country to win a court battle against two large search engines, such as Google and Yahoo! This is because it considers companies responsible for the content that appears in their search engines. But there are exceptions, such as when photographs of minors are placed where they are in the best interests of the public. The case was won by lawyer Martn Leguizamon, a specialist in computer law, and the first to obtain a ruling that determines that companies have responsibility for the content they enable. The court ruled that search engines have the obligation to take requests from users who request the deletion of content that negatively affects them.