Congress had one month to respond to the conflict of powers approved by the full Senate last Wednesday, with 144 votes in favor (those of the PP, Vox, and the Canarian Coalition). But the effective and negative response came in the shortest possible time, during the routine meeting held by the Lower House Board on Tuesdays.
Congressional lawyers describe the conflict as "interference" and urge the PP to go to the Constitutional Court. For their part, the socialists denounce the "delaying strategy" of the Popular Party and challenge them to take the case before the court of guarantees. All in the midst of an unprecedented struggle. "Congress has a period of 30 days to respond. Let's see how Congress responds," says the PP's Alberto Nez Feijóo, who is in charge of the amnesty law in the Senate. The PP leadership still does not clarify whether it will complete the process by denouncing the conflict before the Constitutional court. Popular parliamentary sources have denounced this Tuesday that the Congressional Board does not have “powers” to respond to the request made by the Senate. The Senate has another month to denounce the Lower House before the Constitutional Court after receiving its response. The PSOE maintains that the PP acted as a “bluff” by raising the institutional clash and challenging it to go to the court of guarantees now. Meanwhile, the amnesty law continues its processing in the Senate without brakes. What affects the most is what happens closest. So you don't miss anything, subscribe to the Daily Mail's online news service at: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-article-2938761/popular-parliamentary-sources-deny-that-the Congressional Board does not have powers to respond to the request made by the Senate. The Daily Mail's news service is based in Madrid and has a team of correspondents around the world.